This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: h8300 on testsuite and -wrap

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
Cc: GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:43:08 -0600
Subject: Re: h8300 on testsuite and -wrap
References: <48DC051C.1040908@oarcorp.com> <48DC05A7.2010601@redhat.com> <48DD0FF2.6080302@oarcorp.com>

Joel Sherrill wrote:

I hacked.  Turned on -DUNDERSCORES and added a method
to add the name they expected and call the right one.
Results aren't great but they are current now.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-09/msg02213.html

FWIW, raw H8 testing with newlib is rather pointless because of the insanely small address space. Unfortunately, the linker doesn't report relocation overflows and there's more heap/stack collisions than one can easily count. The combination of those makes the raw H8 testresults damn difficult to interpret.

Testing with -mh and -ms is far more meaningful.

jeff

References:
- h8300 on testsuite and -wrap
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: h8300 on testsuite and -wrap
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: h8300 on testsuite and -wrap
  - From: Joel Sherrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]