This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: improving testsuite runtime

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:55:36 +1000
Subject: Re: improving testsuite runtime
References: <1221737823.15255.22.camel@helios> <m3r67he751.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1221781307.14192.0.camel@helios> <1221785502.9338.40.camel@sjoa>

> Do people still use compare_tests?  Talking with Janis, she mentioned that
> it wasn't multilib (ie, RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}')
> compatible, but that test_summary was.  It's what I've been using to
> compare two runs.

I have used compare_tests for a long, long time.

Ben

PS: What's test_summary?  :-)

References:
- improving testsuite runtime
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: improving testsuite runtime
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: improving testsuite runtime
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: improving testsuite runtime
  - From: Peter Bergner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]