This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Sebastian Redl <sebastian dot redl at getdesigned dot at>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:46:36 +0200
Subject: Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
References: <48AEE25D.9070306@oracle.com> <6dc9ffc80808220905p7276dc22xba4f3e2300934ae9@mail.gmail.com> <48AEE953.5030208@oracle.com> <48AEEB1E.7010909@getdesigned.at> <48AEED03.9060403@oracle.com>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

Sebastian Redl wrote:
Could we simply export __exchange_and_add and __atomic_add from libsupc++ instead of libstdc++? They are pretty basic building blocks in my opinion.
I agree, in principle.

Well, thinking more about it, I don't see how you can do it without breaking the binary compatibility...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
  - From: Sebastian Redl

References:
- Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
  - From: Sebastian Redl
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regression on i686-linux: abi/cxx_runtime_only_linkage.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]