This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: gcj/sparc64?
- From: Jay <jayk123 at hotmail dot com>
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:56:42 +0000
- Subject: RE: gcj/sparc64?
- References: <1216680495.31069.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> <COL101-W834B0BE1410DDD2EA7AF9EE6870@phx.gbl> <m3k5fbl4ly.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <488B3E30.1090008@redhat.com> <COL101-W81D72D008BD8C93AC10988E6760@phx.gbl> <489EAB81.ED1F6D2B@dessent.net>
This seems t have worked, applied against 4.3.1,
based on what I saw was the MinGW fix.
$ diff -u /src/gcc.orig/config/mh-cygwin /src/gcc/config/mh-cygwin
--- /src/gcc.orig/config/mh-cygwin 2002-12-16 18:58:05.000000000 -0800
+++ /src/gcc/config/mh-cygwin 2008-08-10 06:09:39.718750000 -0700
@@ -4,3 +4,5 @@
all-gdb: maybe-all-libtermcap
install-gdb: maybe-all-libtermcap
+
+LDFLAGS = -Wl,--stack,8388608
I'll retest the break and a fix for Solaris /significantly later/.
>> From: brian@
>>>
>> This stack exhaustion is PR36218 which was supposedly fixed on
>> mainline. Two problems: the fix needs to be extended to Cygwin as well
>> as MinGW, and you're not building mainline.
>> zero to do with the topic of this thread.
> Not worth changing the gcc code to reduce or eliminate the recursion?
Thanks,
- Jay