This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:29:12 -0400
- Subject: Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information
- References: <or7ib5r8mb.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 06:39:40PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Here's my first cut at trying to tell how well or how bad we perform
> in terms of debug info, that can be dropped into the GCC run-time test
> infrastructure and used by means of #include in new tests that add
> GUALCHK* annotations (or with separate compilation, if some stuff is
> moved into a separate header).
FWIW, I think this is a good approach.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery