This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: machine figure

From: Mark Mielke <mark at mark dot mielke dot cc>
To: Jason mclaughlin <mcjason at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:55:22 -0400
Subject: Re: machine figure
References: <8bfdd4d60807231033u2fe76ccdla67ac0d84369fa57@mail.gmail.com>

Jason mclaughlin wrote:

Say pieces on a board, make each a pair with another piece.

like...
|55|44|66|
|44|66|55|
so figure out how a piece can move.

This is the second post I've seen like this - and no responses.

What is the proposed value of this line of thinking? Is there some particular optimization that can be designed as a result? Do you have verifiable evidence that it will provide value? Perhaps sample C code and the theoretical assembler code you think should be generated alongside the current assembler code generated by GCC? Or is this rambling thoughts on a subject? I'm interested in reading about the former. I have no interest at all in reading about the latter. :-)

Cheers,
mark


--
Mark Mielke <mark@mielke.cc>

References:
- machine figure
  - From: Jason mclaughlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]