This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?

From: Olivier Hainque <hainque at adacore dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, hainque at adacore dot com
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:50:38 +0200
Subject: Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
References: <20080711161512.GA24187@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <84fc9c000807110921h2776cfbifef25c98914590e4@mail.gmail.com> <20080711164948.GA24535@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <84fc9c000807110953p3d0985c0h38fc906c4a15984c@mail.gmail.com> <20080711172259.GA2627@cardhu.act-europe.fr> <84fc9c000807111035v528dc617od032ebb8acee1807@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Richard,

Still looking into this issue.

Our current understanding is that our initial bug was indirectly
caused by the Ada front-end setting TREE_STATIC on a DECL_EXTERNAL
constant, which it shouldn't do.

The straightforward fix to that uncovered corner issues with the
way we set DECL_CONTEXT in some special cases.

Investigating further ...

Thanks for your constructive feedback,

Olivier

References:
- refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]