gcc archive
date index for July, 2008

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2008
23:52 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Denys Vlasenko
23:51 RE: Help with identifing all cost models in GCC to make it adaptable ?.. Grigori Fursin
23:50 Re: Inconsistent use of allocator wrapper macros in libiberty DJ Delorie
22:58 Inconsistent use of allocator wrapper macros in libiberty Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:50 gcc-4.3-20080731 is now available gccadmin
20:30 Re: Help with identifing all cost models in GCC to make it adaptable ?.. David Edelsohn
19:33 Re: The g++ error output Ian Lance Taylor
19:09 Help with identifing all cost models in GCC to make it adaptable ?.. Grigori Fursin
17:27 The g++ error output ingmar wirths
17:24 GNAT build failure on cross Joel Sherrill
17:22 Re: [Ada] GCC Ada bootstrap suggestion Laurent GUERBY
16:54 Re: [Ada] GCC Ada bootstrap suggestion Arnaud Charlet
16:40 Re: [Ada] GCC Ada bootstrap suggestion Daniel Kraft
15:00 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Brian Dessent
14:45 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Jason Merrill
13:54 Re: configuring in-tree gmp/mpfr with "none"? Paolo Bonzini
13:17 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Jakub Jelinek
13:12 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Paolo Bonzini
13:05 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Ralf Wildenhues
13:05 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Paolo Bonzini
12:54 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Paolo Bonzini
11:56 RE: std::isfinite broken? Dave Korn
11:45 RE: std::isfinite broken? Dave Korn
11:41 Re: std::isfinite broken? Neal Becker
11:00 RE: configuring in-tree gmp/mpfr with "none"? Jay
10:58 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Bo Yang
09:36 RE: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dave Korn
09:36 GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-31) Jakub Jelinek
09:13 Re: shouldn't every middle-end pass be uniquely named? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:03 Access the BIND_EXPR of a function Thomas A.M. Bernard
08:25 Re: shouldn't every middle-end pass be uniquely named? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
08:18 Re: shouldn't every middle-end pass be uniquely named? Andrew Thomas Pinski
08:12 shouldn't every middle-end pass be uniquely named? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:14 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
02:57 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Christopher Faylor

July 30, 2008
22:42 gcc-4.2-20080730 is now available gccadmin
18:21 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Denys Vlasenko
18:12 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dennis Clarke
17:52 Re: Pedantic error on address-of main breaks libjava bootstrap Andrew Haley
17:24 Re: Pedantic error on address-of main breaks libjava bootstrap Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:15 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
16:56 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Benjamin Smedberg
16:55 Re: Pedantic error on address-of main breaks libjava bootstrap Aaron W. LaFramboise
16:52 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Brian Dessent
16:40 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Benjamin Smedberg
16:37 Re: unsigned comparison warning Hariharan
16:09 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Denys Vlasenko
15:58 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Denys Vlasenko
15:38 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dennis Clarke
15:34 Re: std::isfinite broken? Paolo Carlini
15:29 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Daniel Jacobowitz
15:24 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Eus
15:16 Re: std::isfinite broken? Eus
12:10 Re: Support for OpenVMS host supports Arnaud Charlet
11:59 Support for OpenVMS host supports Paolo Bonzini
11:01 Re: failure notice Andrew Haley
09:38 RE: failure notice Dave Korn
09:24 Re: failure notice G Shyam Sundar
08:50 Re: gcc 4.3.0, -Wconversion: assignment-by operators for shorter types Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:47 Re: gcc 4.3.0, -Wconversion: assignment-by operators for shorter types Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:24 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Richard Guenther
08:12 Re: Pedantic error on address-of main breaks libjava bootstrap Andrew Haley
01:00 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
00:51 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
00:45 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
00:36 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin

July 29, 2008
21:53 Re: Thread safety annotations and analysis in GCC Le-Chun Wu
19:22 Pedantic error on address-of main breaks libjava bootstrap Aaron W. LaFramboise
19:02 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Alexandre Oliva
19:00 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Paolo Bonzini
18:58 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Alexandre Oliva
18:52 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Alexandre Oliva
14:45 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
14:11 Re: unsigned comparison warning Ian Lance Taylor
13:17 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Tim Prince
13:09 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Michael Matz
11:59 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Joseph S. Myers
11:55 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Joseph S. Myers
11:35 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
11:17 How are we supposed to play along the autovectorizer in c++? (alignment issues) tbp
09:55 unsigned comparison warning Hariharan
09:31 New mirror GCC at FPT Telecom mirror at fpt dot net
09:30 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Steven Bosscher
09:26 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Richard Guenther
09:24 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Richard Guenther
06:29 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Paolo Bonzini
06:15 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Ben Elliston
06:11 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
05:27 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
04:43 Re: GCC trunk frozen for the tuples merge Ben Elliston
03:19 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Ian Lance Taylor
03:18 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Ian Lance Taylor
02:00 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Joseph S. Myers
01:31 Re: gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Bo Yang
00:48 Re: frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Alexandre Oliva

July 28, 2008
23:24 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Gerald Pfeifer
21:40 frameworklet to assess the quality of debug information Alexandre Oliva
19:44 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Richard Sandiford
18:37 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dennis Clarke
18:31 RE: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dave Korn
18:16 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Ian Lance Taylor
17:54 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dennis Clarke
17:37 Re: Aldy and Jakub apponted GIMPLE maintainers Aldy Hernandez
17:19 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Paolo Carlini
17:09 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dennis Clarke
16:32 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Michael Matz
15:09 Re: GCC trunk frozen for the tuples merge Jack Howarth
15:05 Re: GCC trunk frozen for the tuples merge Richard Guenther
15:02 Re: GCC trunk frozen for the tuples merge Jack Howarth
14:42 Re: GCC trunk frozen for the tuples merge Richard Guenther
14:40 Aldy and Jakub apponted GIMPLE maintainers David Edelsohn
13:20 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Michael Matz
12:10 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Daniel Jacobowitz
12:03 Re: std::isfinite broken? Neal Becker
12:00 Re: std::isfinite broken? Paolo Carlini
11:54 Re: std::isfinite broken? Paolo Carlini
11:53 Re: std::isfinite broken? Richard Guenther
11:51 Re: std::isfinite broken? Neal Becker
11:45 Re: std::isfinite broken? Paolo Carlini
11:22 std::isfinite broken? Neal Becker
10:57 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
09:59 Re: I will not merge tuples into mainline today Martin Jambor
09:04 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Andrew Haley
09:03 patch for long lines in makefile Jay
00:08 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
00:05 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin

July 27, 2008
23:51 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
23:50 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
23:48 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
23:42 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
21:37 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Mark Mitchell
19:10 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
18:57 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
18:34 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
18:30 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Andrew Pinski
18:10 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Richard Guenther
17:19 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell
16:34 GCC trunk frozen for the tuples merge Richard Guenther
16:33 Re: Recent warning regression: no return statement in function returning non-void Jan Hubicka
11:33 Re: Recent warning regression: no return statement in function returning non-void Richard Guenther
11:25 Build failure with Cygwin Paul Richard Thomas
11:19 Recent warning regression: no return statement in function returning non-void Gerald Pfeifer
09:57 Re: [tuples] New memory/time comparison vs trunk Jan Hubicka
09:11 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Richard Sandiford

July 26, 2008
19:06 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Diego Novillo
18:48 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Richard Guenther
18:43 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
17:55 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Richard Guenther
17:49 Re: lto gimple types and debug info David Edelsohn
15:10 Re: gcj/sparc64? Andrew Haley
08:18 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
08:12 RE: --sysroot=yes Jay
03:33 gcc emit wrong symbols in multiple inheritance case Bo Yang
00:51 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Chris Lattner
00:49 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
00:31 Re: gcc-4.4-20080725 is now available Dennis Clarke
00:23 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Mark Mitchell

July 25, 2008
22:46 gcc-4.4-20080725 is now available gccadmin
22:10 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Michael Meissner
20:21 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Jan Hubicka
20:14 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today David Edelsohn
19:48 Re: I will not merge tuples into mainline today Richard Guenther
19:39 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Yair Lifshitz
19:36 I will not merge tuples into mainline today Diego Novillo
19:35 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
19:33 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
19:31 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Jan Hubicka
18:27 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Aldy Hernandez
18:25 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Aldy Hernandez
16:38 RE: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Dave Korn
16:30 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
16:28 RE: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Dave Korn
16:27 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Steven Bosscher
16:21 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Michael Matz
16:20 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
16:15 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Diego Novillo
16:09 Re: installed gnat files in multilib install Laurent GUERBY
16:03 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
15:59 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Diego Novillo
15:57 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Richard Guenther
15:47 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Chris Lattner
15:43 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
15:29 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today H.J. Lu
15:26 Re: Merging tuples branch into mainline today Mark Mitchell
15:04 Merging tuples branch into mainline today Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Joel Sherrill
13:21 Re: GCC, the GNU linker and the -z extract option H.J. Lu
13:12 Re: Length-Changing Prefixes problem with the x86 Backend Agner Fog
12:24 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
12:20 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
11:51 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Richard Guenther
11:47 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
11:32 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Paolo Bonzini
11:00 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Laurent GUERBY
10:55 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Joseph S. Myers
10:52 RE: --sysroot=yes Joseph S. Myers
10:20 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Laurent GUERBY
09:39 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Arnaud Charlet
09:10 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Paolo Bonzini
09:07 GCC, the GNU linker and the -z extract option eoin
09:04 RE: --sysroot=yes Jay
08:54 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Richard Guenther
08:39 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Andreas Schwab
08:21 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Arnaud Charlet
08:16 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Paolo Bonzini
07:35 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Arnaud Charlet
07:23 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Arnaud Charlet
07:23 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Laurent GUERBY
07:09 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
07:01 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take three Arnaud Charlet
06:22 [Ada] multilib patch take three Laurent GUERBY
05:45 RE: gcj/sparc64? Jay
05:43 --sysroot=yes Jay
05:01 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Chris Lattner
00:54 Re: machine cheat Martin Michlmayr

July 24, 2008
23:18 Re: machine cheat Ben Elliston
22:47 gcc-4.3-20080724 is now available gccadmin
22:11 You make my world beautiful flaro088
22:10 Re: Scratch register in "jump" instruction ? Stelian Pop
22:07 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Michael Meissner
22:05 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Michael Meissner
22:02 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
21:57 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
21:37 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Arnaud Charlet
21:33 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Daniel Berlin
21:13 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Chris Lattner
21:01 Re: gimple type system Gaius Mulley
20:57 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Daniel Jacobowitz
20:25 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Richard Sandiford
20:18 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Daniel Jacobowitz
19:48 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Daniel Berlin
19:04 nice ovv Female e z. EricStewart59
18:23 Re: RFC: Bug in specs processing Mark Mitchell
17:21 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
17:17 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
17:10 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Raksit Ashok
17:09 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:06 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Peter Bergner
17:04 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Chris Lattner
16:53 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:49 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Andreas Schwab
16:44 Re: Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? H.J. Lu
16:38 Re: lto gimple types and debug info Arnaud Charlet
16:35 Bootstrap failures on ToT, changes with no ChangeLog entry? Steve Ellcey
16:26 lto gimple types and debug info Kenneth Zadeck
16:17 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Daniel Jacobowitz
15:11 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
15:02 collect2: ld returned 12 exit status Shlom Marom
14:50 Re: gcj/sparc64? Tom Tromey
14:40 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Joseph S. Myers
14:07 machine cheat Jason mclaughlin
13:59 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Richard Guenther
13:32 endian problems using the pack(1) pragma for data structure by the powerpc compiler Thomas Korn
13:31 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
13:20 Need a pointer for debugging Mohamed Shafi
11:44 RE: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dave Korn
10:29 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Basile STARYNKEVITCH
10:10 Status of the tuples branch - request for primary/secondary taget maintainers help Richard Guenther
10:09 fixincludes takes wrong files? (possible sysroot/build-sysroot confusion?) Jay
10:01 RE: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dave Korn
09:41 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler ZoltÃn KÃcsi
08:52 gcj/sparc64? Jay
08:04 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
06:26 machine figure (re) Jason mclaughlin
02:09 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Dennis Clarke

July 23, 2008
22:43 gcc-4.2-20080723 is now available gccadmin
21:26 [tuples] Merge with mainline @138071 Aldy Hernandez
20:27 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Paolo Carlini
19:16 [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: QUERY : why is -mno-fpu deprecated when we need it for integer only software?]] Aaron P. D'Souza
18:55 Re: machine figure Mark Mielke
18:02 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Paolo Carlini
17:56 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Mark Mitchell
17:39 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Paolo Carlini
17:33 machine figure Jason mclaughlin
17:25 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Mark Mitchell
16:49 Re: gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Tim Prince
16:16 gcc will become the best optimizing x86 compiler Agner Fog
15:31 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Paolo Carlini
15:22 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Paolo Carlini
15:14 RE: Is cross-section inlining valid behaviour? Bingfeng Mei
15:07 Re: Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Sebastian Redl
15:05 RE: Is cross-section inlining valid behaviour? Dave Korn
14:59 Re: Is cross-section inlining valid behaviour? Richard Guenther
14:54 Recent warning regression in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ Paolo Carlini
14:46 Is cross-section inlining valid behaviour? Bingfeng Mei
11:44 FYI : veneer code zeroed problem not yet solved in binutils-2.18 Aaron P. D'Souza
09:00 QUERY : why is -mno-fpu deprecated when we need it for integer only software? Aaron P. D'Souza
08:36 expressing a working machine Jason mclaughlin
06:07 Re: Thread safety annotations and analysis in GCC Ken Raeburn
00:00 Re: RFC: Bug in specs processing Joe Buck

July 22, 2008
23:57 Re: RFC: Bug in specs processing Andrew Pinski
23:53 RFC: Bug in specs processing Mark Mitchell
22:20 Re: How to determine if a decl is a class member in GCC Benjamin Smedberg
21:40 Re: How to determine if a decl is a class member in GCC Le-Chun Wu
21:32 [tuples] New memory/time comparison vs trunk Diego Novillo
20:44 Re: [Ada] multilib patch / -imultilib and language drivers Paolo Bonzini
19:33 Re: How to determine if a decl is a class member in GCC Benjamin Smedberg
19:07 Re: [Ada] multilib patch / -imultilib and language drivers Joseph S. Myers
17:59 Re: [Ada] multilib patch / -imultilib and language drivers Laurent GUERBY
15:50 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Joel Sherrill
15:47 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Arnaud Charlet
15:44 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
15:28 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Arnaud Charlet
15:24 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working laurent
15:22 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
15:12 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
15:02 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Joel Sherrill
14:09 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working laurent
14:05 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
13:52 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working laurent
13:43 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
13:40 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Arnaud Charlet
13:33 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working laurent
13:05 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
12:40 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Arnaud Charlet
12:04 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working laurent
11:41 Re: [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Paolo Bonzini
11:29 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Daniel Berlin
11:25 [Ada] multilib patch take two => multilib build working Laurent GUERBY
07:55 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Andreas Schwab
02:32 real machine Jason mclaughlin
00:25 Re: How to determine if a decl is a class member in GCC Le-Chun Wu

July 21, 2008
22:48 RE: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Dave Korn
20:33 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Ian Lance Taylor
19:04 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Joe Buck
18:51 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:46 Re: [WWW] Updating GCC Links and Selected Readings Gerald Pfeifer
16:06 Re: Porting gcc 4.x on tangent A4 Joern Rennecke
14:49 RE: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Dave Korn
13:44 ICE in flow.c - Gcc 4.1.2 private port Mohamed Shafi
13:38 Scratch register in "jump" instruction ? Stelian Pop
13:33 Porting gcc 4.x on tangent A4 Giuseppe Monteleone
12:33 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? David Edelsohn
12:25 Re: [RFH][tuples] Make Ada work Richard Guenther
12:20 Re: [RFH][tuples] Make Ada work Diego Novillo
11:53 RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/optimize.html Why is the biggest problem missing from this page. Dave Korn
11:13 http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/optimize.html Why is the biggest problem missing from this page. Peter Dolding
08:48 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Richard Guenther
06:36 Re: [Ada] multilib first patch Laurent GUERBY
06:18 Second Notice!!! Mr Hamilton Grey
06:18 Second Notice!!! Mr Hamilton Grey
05:39 Re: What are the functions that i can use? Ian Lance Taylor
04:37 Re: [Ada] multilib first patch Paolo Bonzini
04:09 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Kaveh R. GHAZI
04:03 working machine posture Jason mclaughlin

July 20, 2008
22:42 Dale Lilia Dale
20:56 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Richard Guenther
20:51 Re: Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:09 [Ada] multilib first patch Laurent GUERBY
18:39 Re: [RFH][tuples] Make Ada work Arnaud Charlet
17:44 [RFH][tuples] Make Ada work Richard Guenther
09:30 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Andi Kleen
08:36 Anyone/anything still using CVS on gcc.gnu.org? Gerald Pfeifer
08:10 Re: [WWW] Updating GCC Links and Selected Readings Arnaud Charlet
08:03 Re: [WWW] Updating GCC Links and Selected Readings Gerald Pfeifer
07:20 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Yair Lifshitz
06:44 working machine Jason mclaughlin
04:45 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Joe Buck

July 19, 2008
22:54 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Robert Dewar
22:33 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Andi Kleen
15:35 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Yair Lifshitz
15:32 Re: compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Robert Dewar
15:30 compressed pointer type implementation in gcc Yair Lifshitz
12:36 What are the functions that i can use? Mohamed Shafi
10:07 Re: gimple type system Richard Guenther
01:36 Re: [tuples] Jakub is now branch maintainer Diego Novillo

July 18, 2008
22:49 gcc-4.4-20080718 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: gimple type system Kenneth Zadeck
21:42 Re: gimple type system Richard Guenther
21:25 gimple type system Kenneth Zadeck
21:00 Adapting GCC to compile code for software CPU Adel Abushaev
17:22 How to determine if a decl is a class member in GCC Le-Chun Wu
11:41 Re: Where to get a list of warning and error messages Philipp Thomas
11:40 Re: Where to get a list of warning and error messages Robert Dewar
11:15 Where to get a list of warning and error messages Simon Toth
10:56 gmp-4.2.2 t-printf test fails when compiled with trunk revision 137937 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
10:45 Re: Set environment variable on remote target Jie Zhang
07:53 Re: Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich

July 17, 2008
22:45 gcc-4.3-20080717 is now available gccadmin
18:02 Re: Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Ralf Wildenhues
16:51 Re: How to implement conditional execution Paul Brook
16:31 Re: Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
15:51 Re: Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu H.J. Lu
15:48 Re: Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
15:36 Re: Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu H.J. Lu
14:52 Bootstrap failure in stage 1 on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
12:09 Re: Set environment variable on remote target Andreas Schwab
11:28 Re: size of array "" is too large Nicholas Sherlock
11:23 Re: Set environment variable on remote target Jie Zhang
10:40 size of array "" is too large Hariharan
08:28 RE: Question about doloop_end pattern Bingfeng Mei
08:00 Re: Set environment variable on remote target Andreas Schwab
04:26 Re: Set environment variable on remote target Jie Zhang

July 16, 2008
22:41 gcc-4.2-20080716 is now available gccadmin
18:17 Re: Question about doloop_end pattern Ramana Radhakrishnan
17:23 Re: Set environment variable on remote target Andreas Schwab
16:53 Set environment variable on remote target Jie Zhang
15:18 RE: Question about doloop_end pattern Bingfeng Mei
15:05 Re: Question about doloop_end pattern Joern Rennecke
14:50 Re: A question about varargs Ian Lance Taylor
14:50 Re: [tuples] Jakub is now branch maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
14:07 Re: A question about varargs Mohamed Shafi
14:01 Re: Question about doloop_end pattern Ian Lance Taylor
13:57 Re: A question about varargs Ian Lance Taylor
11:06 Question about doloop_end pattern Bingfeng Mei
10:32 A question about varargs Mohamed Shafi
09:40 Re: Is this the expected behavior? Paolo Bonzini
08:24 Re: Ada bootstrap failure for i686-pc-linux-gnu on trunk Andreas Schwab
07:41 Ada bootstrap failure for i686-pc-linux-gnu on trunk Rainer Emrich
01:10 Re: POSIX in g++ Ian Lance Taylor

July 15, 2008
23:49 Re: POSIX in g++ Peng Yu
23:46 Re: POSIX in g++ Peng Yu
22:57 Re: POSIX in g++ Ian Lance Taylor
22:57 [tuples] merge with mainline @137837 Aldy Hernandez
21:57 POSIX in g++ Peng Yu
21:53 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Silvius Rus
21:28 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Silvius Rus
16:54 [WWW] Updating GCC Links and Selected Readings Santiago Urueña Pascual
16:16 Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in Andrew Haley
15:07 Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in Steve Perkins
13:51 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Olivier Hainque
13:14 Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in Andrew Haley
10:11 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Paolo Carlini
08:55 Re: Optimising for size Hariharan
08:29 Re: [tuples] Bootstrap failure building libjava on ppc64 Richard Guenther
07:29 Re: Is this the expected behavior? Mohamed Shafi
07:26 Re: Is this the expected behavior? Ramana Radhakrishnan
07:23 Re: Is this the expected behavior? Mohamed Shafi
06:57 Re: Is this the expected behavior? Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:50 Is this the expected behavior? Mohamed Shafi
03:30 Re: [tuples] Bootstrap failure building libjava on ppc64 Daniel Berlin
01:23 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Doug Gregor

July 14, 2008
23:20 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Benjamin Kosnik
22:56 Re: [m32c] newlib build failure in reload DJ Delorie
22:39 Re: [m32c] newlib build failure in reload Joseph S. Myers
22:34 Re: [m32c] newlib build failure in reload DJ Delorie
21:33 Re: [tuples] Jakub is now branch maintainer Aldy Hernandez
21:29 [tuples] Jakub is now branch maintainer Diego Novillo
21:27 Re: [m32c] newlib build failure in reload Joseph S. Myers
21:23 [tuples] Bootstrap failure building libjava on ppc64 Diego Novillo
20:57 [m32c] newlib build failure in reload DJ Delorie
16:18 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-14) Richard Guenther
16:17 Re: GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-14) NightStrike
15:09 Re: Optimizing for size Alexandre Pereira Nunes
14:20 Re: Optimising for size Joel Sherrill
10:01 Another recent libstdc++ regression Paolo Carlini
08:56 GCC 4.3.2 Status Report (2008-07-14) Richard Guenther
04:03 Re: Optimising for size Joe Buck

July 13, 2008
23:52 Optimising for size zoltan
16:56 Re: Byte permutation optimization Daniel Berlin
10:30 Re: Byte permutation optimization Andi Kleen

July 12, 2008
20:50 Byte permutation optimization Nils Pipenbrinck
19:14 Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in David Daney
17:52 GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in Steve Perkins
16:39 successful bootstrap Christian Schüler
15:15 Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions Daniel Berlin
13:08 Looking For Good Partner johnmakeni at john dot makeni
13:04 Re: GCC 4.1 branch closed Joseph S. Myers
10:42 Re: Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi
09:27 Re: GCC 4.1 branch closed Gerald Pfeifer
00:41 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Silvius Rus
00:31 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Silvius Rus

July 11, 2008
23:16 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Silvius Rus
23:14 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Lixia Liu
22:46 gcc-4.4-20080711 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Paolo Carlini
22:25 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Paolo Carlini
22:18 Re: New branch for STL Advisor Paolo Carlini
21:54 New branch for STL Advisor Silvius Rus
19:26 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Eric Botcazou
18:42 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Richard Guenther
18:17 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Eric Botcazou
18:10 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Raksit Ashok
17:57 Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions Daniel Berlin
17:35 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Richard Guenther
17:23 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Olivier Hainque
17:18 Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions Paolo Carlini
16:53 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Richard Guenther
16:50 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Olivier Hainque
16:21 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Richard Guenther
16:20 Re: refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Olivier Hainque
16:15 refinements to definition of TREE_READONLY ? Olivier Hainque
16:03 RE: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Dave Korn
16:03 Re: What may be the reason behind not implementing some instructions of H8SX targets in H8300 port? DJ Delorie
15:39 Re: create_tmp_var() fail to create variable for loop with switch statement Fern Moon
15:30 Re: create_tmp_var() fail to create variable for loop with switch statement Richard Guenther
15:24 create_tmp_var() fail to create variable for loop with switch statement Fern Moon
11:48 What may be the reason behind not implementing some instructions of H8SX targets in H8300 port? Deepen Mantri
08:10 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi
03:22 Re: Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Eric Blake

July 10, 2008
22:49 gcc-4.3-20080710 is now available gccadmin
16:02 The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.8 is released H.J. Lu
13:48 Re: [lto] Bootstrap failure Rafael Espindola
13:44 [lto] Bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
13:04 RE: Inefficient loop unrolling. Bingfeng Mei
12:34 Re: Inefficient loop unrolling. Paolo Bonzini
06:55 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Kaveh R. GHAZI
06:16 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk NightStrike
06:04 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Kaveh R. GHAZI
04:46 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Jerry DeLisle
01:55 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Gabriel Dos Reis
00:01 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Joe Buck

July 09, 2008
23:51 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Ben Elliston
22:46 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Steven Bosscher
22:42 gcc-4.2-20080709 is now available gccadmin
21:49 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? H.J. Lu
21:46 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Joe Buck
21:39 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Steve Kargl
21:30 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Steve Kargl
21:21 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? H.J. Lu
21:16 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Andreas Schwab
20:59 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Joe Buck
20:53 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Steve Kargl
20:35 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Joe Buck
20:30 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Joe Buck
20:27 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Jack Lloyd
20:25 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? H.J. Lu
20:18 Re: Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? Joe Buck
20:07 Is that OK to borrow code from coreutils? H.J. Lu
16:59 Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions Daniel Berlin
16:02 Perfect way to gain more health. steve.hannah
14:31 Recent libstdc++ regressions Paolo Carlini
14:17 Re: implementing exception handlers in a front end Gaius Mulley
14:17 Re: Trouble with gdb 6.8 on Irix Olivier Hainque
14:01 Re: implementing exception handlers in a front end Richard Guenther
13:33 implementing exception handlers in a front end Gaius Mulley
09:21 Sell Cisco Systems equipment items helen at nstnetwork dot com

July 08, 2008
20:05 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Andreas Schwab
19:22 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:09 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Kaveh Ghazi
17:12 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Ian Lance Taylor
17:12 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Ian Lance Taylor
17:05 Re: GNU LD fails to generate correct ARM Thumb veneer Aaron P. D'Souza
17:01 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk NightStrike
16:58 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk NightStrike
16:50 Re: C++ Warnings on trunk Ian Lance Taylor
16:33 C++ Warnings on trunk NightStrike
14:32 Re: Stack Versus Heap Ian Lance Taylor
13:59 Stack Versus Heap Michael . Schmidt
09:49 Re: free (static_array) Sajish V
08:48 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi
04:14 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Ian Lance Taylor
02:15 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Kaveh R. GHAZI
00:00 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi

July 07, 2008
23:15 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Ian Lance Taylor
22:22 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi
22:00 Re: GNU LD fails to generate correct ARM Thumb veneer Aaron P. D'Souza
18:48 Re: Trouble with gdb 6.8 on Irix Joseph S. Myers
18:40 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Ian Lance Taylor
17:42 Re: GNU LD fails to generate correct ARM Thumb veneer Nick Clifton
17:26 Re: Trouble with gdb 6.8 on Irix Joel Brobecker
15:51 GNU LD fails to generate correct ARM Thumb veneer Aaron P. D'Souza
14:13 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Gabriel Dos Reis
09:48 RE: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Dave Korn
09:11 If you look stupid in bed revd
08:37 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi
06:13 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Ian Lance Taylor
05:16 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Ian Lance Taylor
00:29 Re: handle preserving gcov Ben Elliston

July 06, 2008
22:38 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Diego Novillo
22:36 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Kaveh R. GHAZI
21:49 Re: -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request Gabriel Dos Reis
20:59 RE: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Dave Korn
20:28 Re: Web page additon Walter Spector
19:55 Re: Web page additon Gerald Pfeifer
19:22 Re: git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches? Daniel Berlin
19:06 Re: git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches? Andreas Schwab
18:32 Re: git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches? Nix
17:44 Re: git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches? Daniel Berlin
16:58 Re: instrument function call failed Richard Guenther
16:57 Re: [patch] Packager files Gerald Pfeifer
16:46 instrument function call failed Fern Moon
15:52 git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches? Nix
14:22 RE: GCC 3.3.3 not on GNU servers... Gerald Pfeifer
07:30 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Cary Coutant
07:28 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Cary Coutant

July 05, 2008
11:16 Re: (new) Failure building GFortran (Cygwin) Angelo Graziosi
10:12 Re: How to get signedness from rtx? Eric Botcazou
09:22 Re: How to get signedness from rtx? Mohamed Shafi
09:06 Re: How to get signedness from rtx? Eric Botcazou
08:47 How to get signedness from rtx? Mohamed Shafi

July 04, 2008
23:19 GCC 4.1 branch closed Joseph S. Myers
22:58 gcc-4.4-20080704 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Daniel Jacobowitz
16:35 -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request PÃdraig Brady
14:30 Re: mklibs on mips broken by gcc-4.3.x Daniel Jacobowitz
13:43 mklibs on mips broken by gcc-4.3.x Chris Steel
12:16 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Rafael Espindola
07:11 Re: question about the ddg construction Tianwei
06:28 Re: question about the ddg construction Steven Bosscher
04:49 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Ian Lance Taylor
03:33 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Ian Lance Taylor
03:31 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Ian Lance Taylor
01:14 Re: [whopr] Design/implementation alternatives for the driver and WPA Cary Coutant
00:51 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Gabriel Dos Reis
00:42 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Kaveh R. GHAZI
00:05 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Diego Novillo

July 03, 2008
23:57 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Kaveh R. GHAZI
23:47 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Diego Novillo
23:36 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC rkiesling
23:25 Re: question about the ddg construction Tianwei
23:13 Re: question about the ddg construction Tianwei
23:03 Re: Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Kaveh R. GHAZI
22:51 gcc-4.3-20080703 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Re: question about the ddg construction Steven Bosscher
22:11 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Chris Lattner
22:05 question about the ddg construction Tianwei
22:01 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Joseph S. Myers
21:25 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Chris Lattner
21:13 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Josh Triplett
21:12 Re: [10 PATCHES] inline functions to avoid stack overflow Mikulas Patocka
18:58 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Joseph S. Myers
18:04 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Chris Lattner
18:01 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Paul Koning
17:51 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Ralf Wildenhues
17:49 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:35 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Chris Lattner
17:29 Re: handle preserving gcov Janis Johnson
17:02 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Andrew Haley
16:38 handle preserving gcov Robert Henry
16:38 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Chris Lattner
16:01 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Jim Wilson
15:57 Bootstrap failures due to C++ warnings with --enable-gather-detailed-memory-stats Diego Novillo
13:48 Re: gcc-in-cxx branch created Hendrik Boom
09:18 RE: Inefficient loop unrolling. Bingfeng Mei
06:50 Re: gcc-in-cxx branch created Daniel Berlin

July 02, 2008
22:54 gcc-4.2-20080702 is now available gccadmin
20:30 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Daniel Jacobowitz
19:56 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Richard Sandiford
19:42 Re: Debug build Ian Lance Taylor
19:32 Re: Debug build John Freeman
18:40 Re: gcc-in-cxx branch created Hendrik Boom
18:11 Re: dumping the tree Taras
16:14 Re: Debug build Ian Lance Taylor
16:02 Re: Inefficient loop unrolling. Steven Bosscher
15:27 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC rkiesling
15:24 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Richard Guenther
15:17 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Vincent Lefevre
15:17 Debug build John Freeman
14:52 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
14:28 How to identify comparison of 8bit operands Mohamed Shafi
14:12 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Andreas Schwab
14:10 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Jack Lloyd
13:48 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Vincent Lefevre
13:40 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Vincent Lefevre
12:15 RE: Inefficient loop unrolling. Bingfeng Mei
12:08 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Daniel Jacobowitz
11:59 Re: Inefficient loop unrolling. Richard Guenther
11:16 Inefficient loop unrolling. Bingfeng Mei
10:14 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Thiemo Seufer
08:46 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Andrew Haley
07:01 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Adam Nemet
04:45 Re: [10 PATCHES] inline functions to avoid stack overflow David Miller
04:39 Re: [10 PATCHES] inline functions to avoid stack overflow Mikulas Patocka
04:34 RE: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC x z
02:32 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Jim Wilson
01:53 RE: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC x z
01:51 questions on using gcov of GCC haod
00:13 RE: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Joseph S. Myers
00:03 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Jim Wilson

July 01, 2008
23:14 RE: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC x z
22:03 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Richard Sandiford
21:28 RE: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC x z
20:44 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Richard Sandiford
20:24 Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS Daniel Jacobowitz
18:33 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Jack Lloyd
18:12 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Ian Lance Taylor
18:03 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Peter Barada
17:52 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Andrew Haley
17:35 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC x z
15:52 Re: free (static_array) Michael Meissner
14:57 Viel Moneten in winziger Zeit Annabella tillmanns
12:00 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Robert Dewar
11:56 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC rkiesling
11:37 Re: free (static_array) Joseph S. Myers
11:05 Re: free (static_array) Michael Meissner
10:56 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Robert Dewar
10:51 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Andrew Haley
07:51 Re: free (static_array) Denys Vlasenko
07:30 Re: Feature request - a macro defined for GCC Denys Vlasenko
07:24 Re: free (static_array) Sajish V
07:14 Re: free (static_array) Denys Vlasenko
06:39 free (static_array) Sajish V
05:34 Feature request - a macro defined for GCC x z
03:28 Re: How to implement conditional execution Michael Meissner
00:00 Re: Linking very large application with GCC trunk on powerpc-linux leads to relocation error of crtbegin/end.o Alan Modra

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3