This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?


On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 10:58 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

> IIRC, then objects in libjava were built from lists of source files as a
> means to avoid per-object overhead of libtool and some other stuff, and
> to produce a bit better code[1].  Now, at least libtool compile mode
> overhead should be a fair bit lower than back then (upstream is a bit
> better, if that turns out to be significant, GCC could sync again).

A few years ago, I hacked the libjava Makefiles to eliminate the use of
libtool of Linux systems.  It cut 20 minutes from the build time on my
(at the time) modern hardware.

Ben



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]