This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Internal abort call optimization?

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi at firstfloor dot org>
Cc: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "David Kastrup" <dak at gnu dot org>, gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:06:47 -0400
Subject: Re: Internal abort call optimization?
References: <86abhki2n0.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87skvcvzxi.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <84fc9c000806170902p5fd8d224k3a637ba0852fe83c@mail.gmail.com> <4857E078.6000105@firstfloor.org>

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> But it would still cross jump the call then wouldn't it?

Depends if they return to the same basic block next ...

-- Pinski

References:
- Internal abort call optimization?
  - From: David Kastrup
- Re: Internal abort call optimization?
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: Internal abort call optimization?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Internal abort call optimization?
  - From: Andi Kleen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]