fno-branch-count-reg misleading documentation woes

[Christian BRUEL <christian dot bruel at st dot com>]

hello,

The documentation for -fno-branch-count-reg explains that a 
dec-and-test-branch instruction is replaced by an equivalent sequence of 
instruction that decrement a register, compare it against 0, and branch. 
(see the use of the world *instead*)

This is not really true, since this option firstly disables the loop 
reversal transformation (loop-init.c::gate_rtl_doloop). As such, the 
generated code will not necessary have an inversed decrement loop count 
created and the sequence of reg testing will not be necessary a 
decrement-test-branch sequence.

another comment: -fbranch-count-reg the instruction is not necessary a 
"decrement and branch" but could also be a "decrement and compare" like 
on the SH.

would a rephrasing like the following be more accurate ?

thanks.

-c

Index: invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- invoke.texi (revision 135611)
+++ invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -5420,10 +5420,7 @@

 @item -fno-branch-count-reg
 @opindex fno-branch-count-reg
-Do not use ``decrement and branch'' instructions on a count register,
-but instead generate a sequence of instructions that decrement a
-register, compare it against zero, then branch based upon the result.
-This option is only meaningful on architectures that support such
+Do not use ``decrement and branch/compare'' instructions on a count 
register. By setting this flag, loop inversion will be disabled. This 
option is only meaningful on architectures that support such
 instructions, which include x86, PowerPC, IA-64 and S/390.

 The default is @option{-fbranch-count-reg}.