This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Revisiting the TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE issue


> You chose to not reply to
>
> "
> Re-association is always possible with my idea - you just need to drop from
> 'does not overflow' to 'may overflow' operations (thus in C speak, from
> signed overflow semantics to unsigned overflow semantics) for the
> expression in question.  IMHO this should allow all optimizations you
> want from TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE types without actually having them.
> "
>
> So do you agree with that?

I'm not sure what the last sentence means. :-)

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]