This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Revisiting the TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE issue

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:17:09 +0200
Subject: Re: Revisiting the TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE issue
References: <200805261047.59798.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200805271107.05841.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <84fc9c000805270302k44a62419rbc4371e7d07e4164@mail.gmail.com>

> Did you even try my initial suggestion from the last discussion to
> make TYPE_IS_SIZETYPEs TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPs?  As
> said in the previous discussion you run into the (optimization) differences
> compared to C because your sizetype is signed (and thus 
TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED).

No, I didn't, I'll give it a whirl.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- Revisiting the TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE issue
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Revisiting the TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE issue
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Revisiting the TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE issue
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]