This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bit_size_type - a data type?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
Cc: richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, shafitvm at gmail dot com
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:29:27 -0400
Subject: Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
References: <ba0bd44d0805120258r3df0233ck4998aa1b91d1fbbd@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000805120311y2d474049od36ff068ef66d268@mail.gmail.com> <10805121126.AA09176@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <84fc9c000805120532j20d5ed50r977d262bba888da3@mail.gmail.com> <10805121324.AA10105@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <84fc9c000805120810j510d769ewd5811f083886079d@mail.gmail.com> <10805121611.AA12093@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:11:26PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > Yes, but for example when cross-compiling from a 32bit host to a 64bit target
> 
> ... which is something that's always never worked completey properly ...

If it doesn't today, then there's no tests covering the problems.
CodeSourcery does this all the time.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Mohamed Shafi
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: bit_size_type - a data type?
  - From: Richard Kenner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]