This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Are x86 builtin load functions "const"?

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:22:05 -0700
Subject: Re: Are x86 builtin load functions "const"?
References: <6dc9ffc80804281247w161cd143k8ebac815f185fd21@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360804281250y6bc01854p1d52fe948875a1cb@mail.gmail.com> <6dc9ffc80804281319l6dd56192ydd2487452874567a@mail.gmail.com> <6dc9ffc80804281716g3284f5d4l4e5ed9ff6cabd636@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:16 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> Load builtins can't be const since they may return different values on
>  the same pointer value.

They should be pure though.

-- Pinski

References:
- Are x86 builtin load functions "const"?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Are x86 builtin load functions "const"?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Are x86 builtin load functions "const"?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Are x86 builtin load functions "const"?
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]