This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm

From: Brian Dessent <brian at dessent dot net>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda dot linux at googlemail dot com>
Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:26:07 -0700
Subject: Re: Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm
References: <200804150534.17118.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <200804162224.35475.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <4806B020.44022592@dessent.net> <200804170504.59786.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Reply-to: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>

Denys Vlasenko wrote:

> Only in my case, $prefix contain neither as nor ld. gcc lives in

Okay, so prepend /usr/app/binutils-2.18-x86_64-linux-uclibc/bin to PATH
and gcc will find and use x86_64-linux-uclibc-{as,ld} without any of
--with-{as,ld}.

> it's much better for sanity that way.

I would argue that it's not, since simply using the same $prefix
JustWorks(tm) without worrying about modifying PATH or any --with-foo.

Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm
  - From: Denys Vlasenko

References:
- Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm
  - From: Denys Vlasenko
- Re: Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm
  - From: Denys Vlasenko
- Re: Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm
  - From: Brian Dessent
- Re: Can't build correctly working crosscompiler with 4.3.0. 4.2.1 worked like charm
  - From: Denys Vlasenko

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]