This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Stelian Pop <stelian at popies dot net>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:21:52 -0400
Subject: Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...
References: <1207687468.5532.44.camel@galileo> <xn63usqcwh.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <1207690955.16640.1.camel@voyager.dsnet> <200804082224.m38MOP3R003161@greed.delorie.com> <1207758006.6264.60.camel@galileo> <200804091641.m39GfKi0015554@greed.delorie.com> <1207768782.5705.1.camel@galileo> <1207776619.17625.10.camel@galileo>

> Maybe I should reserve a special register for this usage (say r0).

That might be the only way, yes.

Note that reload also assumes that such adds don't change the flags
(i.e.  a compare/jump pair must not have a flag-modifying add between
them).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...
  - From: Stelian Pop

References:
- Problem with reloading in a new backend...
  - From: Stelian Pop
- Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...
  - From: Stelian Pop
- Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...
  - From: Stelian Pop
- Re: Problem with reloading in a new backend...
  - From: Stelian Pop

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]