This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Analyzing *-rtems* ACATS

Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:07 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:

Beyond those, I am left with:

============================================
All targets had the following three failures:

c64005c - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH."
c64005d - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH."
c953002 - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH."

These are tests with recursion and local strings, could you
try to run them with more stack for the main thread? (Or in some way
look at their stack usage). I've never seen them fail on a native
platform so this is a wild guess.

Will do.  But the main thread has a 100K stack and these
didn't fail with 4.2.3 and the same settings.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01028.html

I am not on the machine with the compiler so will have to
test this Monday.
Laurent



--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
  Support Available             (256) 722-9985


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]