This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code


On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:06:24PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> The side effect is carried out by using %U0, which expands to u for a
> PRE_{INC,DEC,MODIFY} operand.  There is no way to encode that in the
> insn operand itself, unlike m68k, for example.  The ia64 target has a
> similar issue.

OK, so it's possible to get that right.  Still - how many people
writing inline assembly do we think will do so?

This is back to something the S/390 maintainers were working on a few
months ago; in short the useful definition of "m" to GCC is not the
useful one for users, I don't think.  Especially when it changes.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]