This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text.
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Joern Rennecke wrote:
And @code{(subreg:SI (reg:DF 10) 0)} would be a natural way to
express that
you are using the floating point register as a 32 bit integer register,
with writes clobbering the entire 64 bit of the register.
Yes, this is one possible definition. But there's no reason in this
situation why you couldn't just use a single REG. Why use subregs at
all?
Because before reload, you use pseudos. And in order for
(subreg:SI (reg:DF ...) ...) to be viable, it still has to be viable
between
hard register allocation and alter_reg.
Is that even valid? Are there any known ports using this? AFAIR the
middle-end doesn't create this (although it will use (subreg:SF (reg:DI)).
SPE has patterns for
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "rs6000_nonimmediate_operand" "+r,m")
(subreg:SI (match_operand:SPE64TF 1 "register_operand" "r,r") 4))]
for example.
Paolo