This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Official GCC git repository

From: Nicholas Nethercote <njn at csse dot unimelb dot edu dot au>
To: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:59:42 +1100 (EST)
Subject: Re: Official GCC git repository
References: <47D7F8DA.8060703@codewiz.org> <1205410672.843.22.camel@tobilaptop> <4aca3dc20803130947q4a37f007oc4d4ed281a68526@mail.gmail.com> <1205429250.16203.0.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <4aca3dc20803131035p2d691221h7473e0a6a0de823@mail.gmail.com> <1205430839.16203.13.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <47D96C94.1020100@redhat.com> <1205441904.16203.24.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:

I could never understand why anyone would use anything but CVS (if that
works for them), or git. The VCS-du-jour craze just confuses me.

Version control is complicated, much more so than it first appears. There's a very large design space. Knowing that, it's not surprising that there are so many different VCS systems, embodying lots of different approaches.

Nick

References:
- Official GCC git repository
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Tobias Grosser
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: David Woodhouse
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: David Woodhouse
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: David Woodhouse

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]