This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Benchmarks: 7z, bzip2 & gzip.
- From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy at yahoo dot it>
- To: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:02:34 +0000
- Subject: Re: Benchmarks: 7z, bzip2 & gzip.
- References: <998d0e4a0802290748y3d4535c4qd780fb1533c0ce8c@mail.gmail.com>
2008/2/29, J.C. Pizarro <jcpiza@gmail.com>:
> Here are the results of benchmarks of 3 compressors: 7z, bzip2 and gzip, and
> GCCs 3.4.6, 4.1.3-20080225, 4.2.4-20080227, 4.3.0-20080228 & 4.4.0-20080222.
Thanks, that's very interesting. I had noticed 4.2 producing 10%
larger and 10% slower code for a sample code fragment for ARM but
couldn't follow it up.
Is there a clause in regressions for "takes longer to compile and
produces worse code"?
M