This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: atomic accesses


Segher Boessenkool wrote:
The Linux kernel, and probably some user-space applications and libraries
as well, depend on GCC guaranteeing (a variant of) the following:

    "any access to a naturally aligned scalar object in memory
    that is not a bit-field will be performed by a single machine
    instruction whenever possible"

and it seems the current compiler actually does work like this.

I propose we add this text to the GCC manual (where?), so at least they
are right if/when they blame us for breaking that promise :-)

Comments? Flames?


It seems like a good idea.


This seems somewhat like other issues we have dealt with concerning thread safety. Perhaps an entire section addressing code generation issues related to correct multi-threaded semantics.

David Daney


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]