This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv


Richard Guenther wrote:

The tree optimizers do not recognize +-* of singed integers as
possibly trapping which causes functions to become const/pure that
should not and causes 'dead' code to be removed that should not.

Thanks for the explanations. It seems like tree-ssa should in theory make it easier to implement this; for example, at the point of gimplification one could insert checks, and then just let everything else do its thing. I don't see how libcalls and such would matter in that scheme. I'm not denying that this is a project, though.


I fully agree that claiming things work when they don't is bad -- we don't want to lie to the users! But, is the failure mode that we issue run-time errors when we shouldn't, or that we don't issue run-time errors when we should? The latter is much less severe than the former.

I guess you've withdrawn the deprecation request, so maybe this is something of a moot point now? I certainly agree that we shouldn't let a non-working feature stand in the way of improvements in 4.4.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]