This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, DOC] PR 31549: move -frtl-abstract-sequences description
- From: Gabor Loki <loki at inf dot u-szeged dot hu>
- To: Gabor Loki <loki at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot r at gmail dot com>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:41:17 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, DOC] PR 31549: move -frtl-abstract-sequences description
- References: <20080213203257.GB18934@ins.uni-bonn.de> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802161344500.19228@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <67ea2eb0802160544s2cb0700bv131fe961b7d29874@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802161511220.19228@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <47B993E2.2060303@gcc.gnu.org>
Gabor Loki wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
The last time I tried this on ARM it didn't work because there were
ICEs and it might have been fixed by now.
However searching on bugzilla found me these .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33009
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33642
In the latter Richard wrote "I propose to kill all traces of it unless
someone steps up and maintains this piece of code and we enable it for
-Os".
Gabor, what are your plans? Having a pass which seems to crash more
than anything else doesn't seem useful so I agree with Richard.
First of all I am sorry, but I was a really busy with other things in the past year.
I didn't have enough free time to keep track on CFO related stuffs.
I have just got confirmation that I can spend as many time as needed to
maintain CFO. :-)
So, I am going to fix those bugs.
Thanks for your patients.
--Gabor