This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: pinskia at gmail dot com
Cc: richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:11:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
References: <200801302345.m0UNjwgb024740@greed.delorie.com> <84fc9c000801310221p731c3587s107a4eb4632d67e6@mail.gmail.com> <200801311940.m0VJeTnJ017179@greed.delorie.com> <84fc9c000801311152h5f71570cjb1f4fe4b1be177e9@mail.gmail.com> <200801312000.m0VK0cFW017796@greed.delorie.com> <de8d50360801311206g2d3f5d20p3c4f11771ae66616@mail.gmail.com>

>     case POINTER_PLUS_EXPR:
>       /* Even though the sizetype mode and the pointer's mode can be different
>          expand is able to handle this correctly and get the correct result out
>          of the PLUS_EXPR code.  */

Me thinks that comment now needs some rethinking ;-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]