This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [m32c] type precedence rules and pointer signs
> Can you represent all pointer offsets (well, those you actually
> support) within sizetype?
Yes. It's a limit, but we live with it. It would be nice if the
offsets were extended according to their own sign, which gives us 1.5x
the range of choosing a single signedness.
> If so you probably only need to adjust expansion of
> POINTER_PLUS_EXPR.
Which file would that be in? It wasn't obvious from a simple grep.
Or is that sprinkled all over the place?