This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Doug Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:38:34 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call
References: <20080121190830.3ca1b640@wabash.artheist.org> <24b520d20801251206j25af7291ka71bb59a5396dcf9@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801280220440.4453@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <24b520d20801272001n40e76adbsb5a55320d8d17dde@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote:
> I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has
> nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete
> delegating constructors implementation), and will not be used. If this
> would be better handled by moving the entry to "Inactive Development
> Branches", I'll certainly do that.

Yes, for historical reasons it would be nice to have that branch 
documented there, with a note that/when it was merged into mainline
as for some of the other examples there.

Gerald

PS: Nice patch of yours that fixes seven PRs at once. :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call
  - From: Doug Gregor

References:
- c++0x concepts in gcc call
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call
  - From: Doug Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]