This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
2008/1/21, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>: > On 21/01/2008, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote: > > Christian Joensson wrote: > > > Now, is there some funny stuff going on here that I simply miss or is > > > this what to expect currently? > > > > > I would suggest compiling the testcase outside the testsuite and having > > a look to the pre-processed output. On all the other targets I have > > available things are fine: <memory> includes > > <bits/boost_sp_shared_count.h>, which defines _Sp_make_shared_tag in > > namespace std. > > > > I'm assuming you are seeing that when running the tests in 20_util, > > because the version of shared_ptr in tr1 doesn't use that. > > Paolo's right, _Sp_make_shared_tag is only defined in C++0x mode, but > should always be defined there. > > Christian, please let me know which testsuites fail, and send me the > rest of the diagnostic output (the line you've shown is no use on its > own, it doesn't tell us which testcase failed or if it was compiled in > C++0x mode or not.) > > My first guess would be that you've somehow got the C++0x and TR1 > versions of boost_sp_shared_count.h mixed up and you're including the > wrong one. well, the testsuite results are posted at, e.g., http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00956.html and the libstdc++.log file is attached, compressed using bzip2 -9 -- Cheers, /ChJ
Attachment:
libstdc++.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |