This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Sergei Poselenov <sposelenov at emcraft dot com>
Cc: Duncan Sands <duncan dot sands at math dot u-psud dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:16:45 +0000
Subject: Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?
References: <478DE61D.3060709@emcraft.com> <200801161237.14734.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> <478DF556.2030705@emcraft.com>

Sergei Poselenov writes:
 > 
 > No, all results are for the GCC project. "Mainline" here means the
 > current development version of GCC. For it, the sum of the test code
 > size is 3503061, vs. 3542052 for the gcc_4_0_0 branch. But again,
 > this performance is achieved by the significant regression for the
 > most of the test packages.

Hold on, that's a 1.1% improvement in code size, not a regression.

Andrew.

-- 
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903

References:
- powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?
  - From: Sergei Poselenov
- Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?
  - From: Duncan Sands
- Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?
  - From: Sergei Poselenov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]