This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful

From: "Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
To: gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:56:02 +0100
Subject: Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
References: <200801082328.22849.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <200801131810.30493.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <84fc9c000801130810k6d61830cv2a4e523e934a345f@mail.gmail.com> <200801131814.29074.ismail@pardus.org.tr>

On 13/01/2008, Ismail Dönmez <ismail@pardus.org.tr> wrote:
>
> So we should should just let Manu finish up his patch and get a review as C++
> FE maintainers agreed as well.
>

Patch sent for approval: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00583.html
Extra testing is welcome in case I missed something.

In particular, any reference to flag_pedantic_errors after a permerror
is a potential bug.
Also, suggestions of pedwarns that should actually be permerrors would
be helpful.

Cheers,

Manuel.

References:
- Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail DÃnmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail DÃnmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail Dönmez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]