This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ping re PR20548 [Was: [PATCH] New -fstack-check implementation (1/n)]

From: "Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
To: "Christian Joensson" <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, "GCC Development" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:23:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Ping re PR20548 [Was: [PATCH] New -fstack-check implementation (1/n)]
References: <5460e3330801110414p4eb35851xbfdcd358db78ac26@mail.gmail.com> <6c33472e0801110533p56e58ff8jea7339e09aa4c28e@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/01/2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/01/2008, Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is this proposed patch still being considered, or has it been applied/withdrawn?
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01846.html
> >
>
> It hasn't been applied or withdrawn.
>
> From the comments in PR34118, I think the status is:
>
> "I [Eric Botcazou] am NOT going to pursue this patch
> further, so if you are interested in this, please, feel free to ping the
> relevant maintainers, update the patch as appropriate and commit it on my
> behalf."

Just to avoid confusion. The quotes are unappropriated since this is
my interpretation. of the comments in PR34118. Better read that PR and
figure out your own conclusion.

My apologies to Eric for not clarifying this before.

Manuel.

References:
- Ping re PR20548 [Was: [PATCH] New -fstack-check implementation (1/n)]
  - From: Christian Joensson
- Re: Ping re PR20548 [Was: [PATCH] New -fstack-check implementation (1/n)]
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]