This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:47:29 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
References: <20080108184137.5ec72074@wabash.artheist.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801102229130.4030@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20080110223228.GC11942@synopsys.com>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 02:32:28PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> 
> >   In addition, improvements to the GCC infrastructure allows several 
> >   existing warning flags new ability to spot problematic code.
> > 
> > Is this sentence okay?  I'm not a native speaker, so I might miss a
> > nuance here.
> 
> No, it's badly worded, but fixing it seems to be more than a matter of
> rephrasing.  It's basically saying that existing warning flags will
> produce warnings, but I'd prefer to see something more specific.

           ^- s/warnings/additional warnings/, or maybe "fewer false
positives" as well.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]