This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:32:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
References: <20080108184137.5ec72074@wabash.artheist.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801102229130.4030@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

>   In addition, improvements to the GCC infrastructure allows several 
>   existing warning flags new ability to spot problematic code.
> 
> Is this sentence okay?  I'm not a native speaker, so I might miss a
> nuance here.

No, it's badly worded, but fixing it seems to be more than a matter of
rephrasing.  It's basically saying that existing warning flags will
produce warnings, but I'd prefer to see something more specific.
That is, what kinds of additional warnings should be expected?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [RFC] porting to gcc-4.3 docs
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]