This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Manuel LÃpez-Ib ÃÃez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: Ismail DÃnmez <ismail at pardus dot org dot tr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 09 Jan 2008 08:46:29 -0800
Subject: Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
References: <200801082328.22849.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <200801082345.30788.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <6c33472e0801081428l33bfb4a9vf87e51d8b6b7eaf8@mail.gmail.com> <200801090324.03828.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <6c33472e0801081825i648f0f58x38fb46a57c4e716a@mail.gmail.com>

"Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com> writes:

> Of course there is a third option:
> 
> * Make pedwarns warnings by default unless -Werror or
> --pedantic-errors are given (just like the C front-end).

This makes sense to me.  I have never understood why it is a good idea
for the C++ and C frontends to differ in this way.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail DÃnmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail DÃnmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Ismail Dönmez
- Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]