This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful


On 08/01/2008, Ismail Dönmez <ismail@pardus.org.tr> wrote:
>
> Oh that clears up my confusion. So the right fix would be downgrading this
> redefinition problem to be pedwarn instead. But I see no point in creating a
> bug report if its just gonna be closed as invalid, so I hope we can discuss
> if its feasible to downgrade this error to be a pedwarn.
>
> What I see right now this distributions plug -fpermissive in and just go away.
> But I don't like workarounding gcc this way. I hope we can all agree that
> downrading this error to be a pedwarn is the correct way to go.
>

I am sorry you didn't understand my email and didn't read it
completely. I tried my best.

Cheers,

Manuel.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]