This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:35:47 -0800
Subject: Re: ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86
References: <18306.28712.965027.740080@zebedee.pink> <20080107210457.GA10004@lucon.org> <18307.33118.456533.834701@zebedee.pink> <20080108141309.GA16021@lucon.org> <18307.34486.308051.435767@zebedee.pink>

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:20:38PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> guarantee, but I didn't read it that way.  The core problem is that
> the psABI is very badly worded.  

Bad wording isn't the only problem :-(. That is why there is an
ia32 psABI discussion group. You can bring up any ia32 psABI
issues there.

H.J.

References:
- ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: ABI compatibility regression: Return values on x86
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]