This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Re: A proposal to align GCC stack

From: "Ye, Joey" <joey dot ye at intel dot com>
To: Christian Schüler <cschueler at gmx dot de>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:48:41 +0800
Subject: RE: Re: A proposal to align GCC stack
References: <BB577BF501703042AD7E08EADD8E514F4BDC6B@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> A<loom.20071219T050726-639@post.gmane.org>

Christian Schüler writes:

> Please go forward with this idea!

> The current implementation of force_align_arg_pointer has never worked for me.
This proposal should solve your problem. But to comfirm, I'd like to know the 
root cause. force_align_arg_pointer should have guaranteed 16 bytes align. Are
you using data structure requirement alignment larger than 16? Or maybe you
didn't specify force_align_arg_pointer for all of your functions?

Thanks - Joey

References:
- A proposal to align GCC stack
  - From: Ye, Joey
- Re: A proposal to align GCC stack
  - From: Christian SchÃler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]