This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Rask Ingemann Lambertsen" <rask at sygehus dot dk>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:08:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
References: <571f6b510712181659w64b16ae5ndc32b38de6f5c56c@mail.gmail.com> <20071219153201.GH17368@sygehus.dk> <571f6b510712191317y58d1131dmaa7a00d32c753c56@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/19/07, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's take a bug as an example case: http://gcc.gnu.org/23835
>
> Here, there is a bug report about a huge compile time increase.  The
> release manager decided  that this was not a release blocker for GCC
> 4.2.  So it was marked P4, and it disappeared from the radar for GCC
> 4.3 for everyone who only looks at the "Serious regressions".

Under this system, do P4's and P5's ever get fixed?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: David Daney

References:
- Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]