This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:17:53 -0800
Subject: Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
References: <571f6b510712181659w64b16ae5ndc32b38de6f5c56c@mail.gmail.com> <200712190111.11959.paul@codesourcery.com> <20071219012050.GM2908@synopsys.com> <200712190125.21231.paul@codesourcery.com> <20071219013529.GN2908@synopsys.com>

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:25:19AM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > Ok. I did check the GCC bugzilla help pages, and they don't mention SUSPENDED 
> > at all :-)

I wrote:
> Patches welcome, as they say.

Never mind; see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html

for when to use SUSPENDED.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: David Daney

References:
- Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]