This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Help with another constraint
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 12 December 2007 12:14, Revital1 Eres wrote:
>
> > It seems that the pair m and I is missing (which indicate the memory =
> > constant instruction).
>
> So doesn't the question then become "Why isn't reload reloading the constant
> into a register"?
Yes. And the answer AFAIK is "because it doesn't see a way to
move a constant into a register; it understands "r", not "p" and
"q".
So bviyer, add an "r" alternative. See also the "*" and "#"
qualifiers. No need for bogus 0 -to- memory alternatives.
brgds, H-P