This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Help with another constraint

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'Revital1 Eres'" <ERES at il dot ibm dot com>, "'Balaji V. Iyer'" <bviyer at ncsu dot edu>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <openrisc at opencores dot org>, "'Rask Ingemann Lambertsen'" <rask at sygehus dot dk>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:01:00 -0000
Subject: RE: Help with another constraint
References: <002601c83c7c$b3763960$33160e98@ece.ncsu.edu> <OF55758D8C.871C0678-ONC22573AF.003D4671-C22573AF.00433D08@il.ibm.com>

On 12 December 2007 12:14, Revital1 Eres wrote:

> It seems that the pair m and I is missing (which indicate the memory =
> constant instruction).  

  So doesn't the question then become "Why isn't reload reloading the constant
into a register"?

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with another constraint
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- RE: Help with another constraint
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

References:
- RE: Help with another constraint
  - From: Balaji V. Iyer
- RE: Help with another constraint
  - From: Revital1 Eres

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]