This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: $prefix/lib/../$target/sys-include not in <> search path
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:31:22 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: $prefix/lib/../$target/sys-include not in <> search path
- References: <20071210175823.Y61896@dair.pair.com>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> When configured with just a --prefix=x and --target=y,
> $prefix/lib/../$target/sys-include used to be searched, for e.g.
> limits.h, stdio.h and stdlib.h. No $prefix-rooted path shows
> up as a "ignoring nonexistent directory" message either.
>
> I don't know when this changed, but it doesn't seem like a
> deliberate change. Or at least, not an improvement.
>
> I'll open a PR if I can't resolve this.
I wouldn't call it a resolution, but it seems an installed
toolchain will work. Equivalently:
mkdir -p $prefix/lib/gcc/$target/$gcc_version e.g.
mkdir -p $prefix/lib/gcc/cris-axis-linux-gnu/4.3.0
should let gcc find $prefix/sys-include, because it wants to go
back and forth:
$prefix/lib/gcc/cris-axis-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../../../cris-axis-linux-gnu/sys-include
IIRC it used to be this bad, then something or other changed to
let it find $prefix/sys-include without the intermediate
directories, and now it's bad again. (Bad in that I have to
write into $prefix in order to test, and have to keep a
$gcc_version directory there.)
Or perhaps better hack the testsuite to add a -idirafter or
something. Suggestions welcome. Except "use buildroot" (not
even sure it'd help).
brgds, H-P