This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:22:04 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0712091701160.22215@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <84fc9c000712091521w11b4ef73i4418cb873496a579@mail.gmail.com> <475C8A24.9060901@codesourcery.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0712101516230.19901@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:

>>> I would update the recommended version to 2.3.0 and fail for anything less
>>> than 2.2.1.

> Ok, here's my patch.  Since we may have some developers still using 2.2.0,
> I'll wait say a week after approval before installing to give them time to
> upgrade.

> Ok for mainline?

OK, under the guidelines you suggest above.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

References:
- Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]