gcc archive
date index for December, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 2007
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Frank Ch. Eigler
22:44 gcc-4.1-20071231 is now available gccadmin
19:39 Re: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate Kaveh R. GHAZI
16:55 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
14:45 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
14:25 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
13:39 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8 Boris Boesler
03:31 Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC? nkavv

December 30, 2007
23:43 Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC? Serge Belyshev
16:44 Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC? nkavv
09:16 Status of the DLX backend for GCC? Gerald Pfeifer
02:06 RE: censored naked SSE reciprocals, -mrecip Dave Korn

December 29, 2007
23:03 Re: censored naked SSE reciprocals, -mrecip tbp
22:25 Re: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate Vincent Lefevre
22:01 VACANCY AND REQUIREMENT Mrs Jenny
20:14 RE: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate Dennis Clarke
20:10 RE: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate Dave Korn
20:07 Re: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate Dennis Clarke
18:23 MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate Vincent Lefevre
18:12 Re: glibc 2.7 complex functions are possibly miscompiled by gcc 4.3 trunk Ismail DÃnmez
17:49 Re: glibc 2.7 complex functions are possibly miscompiled by gcc 4.3 trunk Ian Lance Taylor
16:11 Re: glibc 2.7 complex functions are possibly miscompiled by gcc 4.3 trunk Ismail DÃnmez
15:35 Re: censored naked SSE reciprocals, -mrecip Uros Bizjak
06:32 censored naked SSE reciprocals, -mrecip tbp
01:02 Re: glibc 2.7 complex functions are possibly miscompiled by gcc 4.3 trunk Ismail DÃnmez

December 28, 2007
22:47 gcc-4.3-20071228 is now available gccadmin
14:20 Re: glibc 2.7 complex functions are possibly miscompiled by gcc 4.3 trunk Ismail DÃnmez
11:22 gcc-4.3-20071221 compilation problems Taren

December 27, 2007
23:05 10 to 20% speedup with -m64 on Intel Core2Duo Dominique Dhumieres

December 26, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.2-20071226 is now available gccadmin
20:05 Re: Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Geert Bosch
19:25 Re: Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Mark Mitchell
19:10 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Mark Mitchell
18:54 Re: __builtin_expect for indirect function calls Mark Mitchell
17:38 Re: How to describe a FMAC insn Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:00 Re: How to describe a FMAC insn Qing Wei
13:12 Re: How to describe a FMAC insn Richard Kenner
09:08 Status of GCC 4.3 on Alpha (Debian) Martin Michlmayr
07:26 Re: How to describe a FMAC insn Tim Prince
06:00 How to describe a FMAC insn Qing Wei
04:53 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Alexandre Oliva
02:31 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
02:17 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Dewar
02:11 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
01:16 Re: [lto] preliminary SPECint benchmark numbers Chris Lattner
01:05 Re: [lto] preliminary SPECint benchmark numbers Vladimir N. Makarov

December 25, 2007
19:35 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
18:58 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Tim Josling

December 24, 2007
22:42 gcc-4.1-20071224 is now available gccadmin
20:21 [lto] preliminary SPECint benchmark numbers Nathan Froyd
13:55 Greetings! Angel
07:53 RE: Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey

December 23, 2007
17:40 Successful Build Aran Clauson
05:55 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Frank Ch. Eigler
01:36 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
01:32 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andi Kleen
01:20 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
00:52 Regarding WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR Prabhanjan Kambadur

December 22, 2007
22:49 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andi Kleen
21:27 Re: Strange error message from gdb Jan Kratochvil
18:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
17:11 glibc 2.7 complex functions are possibly miscompiled by gcc 4.3 trunk Ismail DÃnmez
13:33 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
11:44 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew Haley
07:38 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Chris Lattner
03:42 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
03:16 Re: __builtin_expect for indirect function calls Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:09 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew Pinski
00:07 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew Pinski
00:02 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor

December 21, 2007
22:46 gcc-4.3-20071221 is now available gccadmin
20:25 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:19 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Christian SchÃler
19:32 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Ross Smith
18:12 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
17:31 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
17:16 sub-optimal stack alignment with __builtin_alloca() Alexandre Oliva
09:27 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together NightStrike
08:36 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Ralf Wildenhues
07:54 Re: Where to find the sources implementing GCC DFA pipeline hazard recognizer Ian Lance Taylor
05:28 Where to find the sources implementing GCC DFA pipeline hazard recognizer Qing Wei
05:10 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together James K. Lowden
04:37 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
03:16 compiling failed. Paul Li
02:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
01:54 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva

December 20, 2007
21:38 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
20:42 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:16 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
18:01 RFC: New mangling for java resources. David Daney
17:02 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Ian Lance Taylor
16:52 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
16:44 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
16:41 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
15:09 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Paul Brook
14:33 Re: Strange error message from gdb Andrew Haley
14:24 Re: Strange error message from gdb Alexandre Oliva
09:32 Re: Strange error message from gdb Andrew Haley
09:11 RE: A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey
08:53 RE: A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey
08:25 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Jan Hubicka
08:18 Re: DEBUG_INSN that is not an insn Steven Bosscher
08:04 [www] get VTA branch entry to refer to design document Alexandre Oliva
08:01 Re: DEBUG_INSN that is not an insn Alexandre Oliva
08:00 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
06:10 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
06:08 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
05:51 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together James K. Lowden
05:16 Re: Strange error message from gdb Alexandre Oliva
05:05 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
04:59 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever David Daney
03:48 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Kenneth Zadeck
03:09 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
01:29 Re: Disabling the heuristic inliner Shaun Jackman
01:25 Disabling the heuristic inliner Shaun Jackman
00:10 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever NightStrike

December 19, 2007
23:11 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
22:59 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Ian Lance Taylor
22:49 gcc-4.2-20071219 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
22:29 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Chris Lattner
22:29 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
22:19 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Tim Josling
21:17 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Steven Bosscher
21:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
20:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
20:39 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
20:15 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Ismail DÃnmez
20:14 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Daniel Jacobowitz
20:11 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Doug Gregor
20:07 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
20:03 -Wparentheses lumps too much together jklowden
20:00 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:00 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:53 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew MacLeod
19:25 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Janis Johnson
19:13 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
19:05 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:05 Re: Strange error message from gdb Daniel Jacobowitz
19:00 Re: Strange error message from gdb Andrew Haley
19:00 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
18:55 Re: Strange error message from gdb Daniel Jacobowitz
18:41 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Kenneth Zadeck
18:01 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
17:54 Re: Strange error message from gdb Andrew Haley
17:29 Re: Strange error message from gdb Daniel Jacobowitz
17:22 Strange error message from gdb Andrew Haley
16:29 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
16:12 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew MacLeod
16:01 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
15:59 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
15:32 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:30 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
14:22 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
13:23 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:16 A proposal to align GCC stack - update Ye, Joey
11:52 vliw scheduling - TImode bug? Hariharan Sandanagobalane
10:33 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
10:06 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Andrew Pinski
09:13 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
09:13 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
06:18 Re: porting gcc to tic54x Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:07 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
05:16 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
05:15 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever David Daney
04:35 RE: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Weddington, Eric
04:30 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
03:51 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
03:16 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
02:18 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Joe Buck
02:07 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
01:58 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
01:53 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Joseph S. Myers
01:46 RE: A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey
01:46 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
01:35 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Joe Buck
01:25 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Paul Brook
01:21 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Robert Dewar
01:21 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Joe Buck
01:14 darwin libgomp build oddity Jack Howarth
01:11 Re: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Paul Brook
01:00 Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever Steven Bosscher

December 18, 2007
23:31 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
23:31 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
23:19 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
22:15 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin
20:15 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:07 Re: Objective-C 2.0 in GCC Ismail DÃnmez
18:47 Re: Objective-C 2.0 in GCC Mike Stump
18:08 Re: Objective-C 2.0 in GCC Ismail DÃnmez
18:05 Re: Objective-C 2.0 in GCC Mike Stump
17:12 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
17:04 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Kenner
16:44 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew Haley
16:42 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
16:32 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
16:31 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
16:28 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew Haley
16:22 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
16:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
15:06 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
14:41 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
13:52 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Robert Dewar
13:48 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Daniel Jacobowitz
13:29 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Jan Hubicka
13:15 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
11:55 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Diego Novillo
08:39 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
08:09 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
08:06 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
07:56 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Kai Henningsen
07:50 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
07:45 RE: A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey
06:16 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
06:15 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
05:17 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack H.J. Lu
04:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
04:29 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
04:25 Re: A proposal to align GCC stack Ross Ridge
02:27 A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey
02:02 Re: __builtin_expect for indirect function calls Jonathan Adamczewski
01:24 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Joe Buck
01:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
01:01 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Diego Novillo
00:52 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
00:06 __builtin_expect for indirect function calls trevor_smigiel

December 17, 2007
22:45 gcc-4.1-20071217 is now available gccadmin
21:24 Re: HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Toon Moene
21:20 Re: HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Toon Moene
20:43 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Diego Novillo
20:31 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
18:38 RE: Help with another constraint Balaji V. Iyer
18:33 Re: Help with another constraint Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:02 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
17:59 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Diego Novillo
17:54 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
14:24 Re: gcc don't allow commas between clauses for openmp Diego Novillo
08:20 Re: gcc don't allow commas between clauses for openmp Lijuan Hai
05:38 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Geert Bosch
01:27 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Joe Buck
01:12 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin

December 16, 2007
22:44 Re: Problem with posix threads Daniel Jacobowitz
22:20 Re: Problem with posix threads Lucas Prado Melo
21:28 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
20:00 unable to find a register to spill in class ‘MD_REGS’ "Rodrigo González Alberquilla"
19:45 Re: Problem with posix threads Lucas Prado Melo
19:43 Re: Problem with SSA inlining and default defs Jakub Jelinek
18:52 Re: HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Toon Moene
18:51 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages NightStrike
18:27 Re: libgfortran, libgomp not compiled with BOOT_CFLAGS. Serge Belyshev
18:10 Re: Problem with SSA inlining and default defs Eric Botcazou
18:01 Re: Problem with SSA inlining and default defs Jakub Jelinek
17:53 Problem with SSA inlining and default defs Eric Botcazou
17:18 Re: HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Sebastian Pop
17:17 RE: Help with another constraint Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:58 Re: HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Toon Moene
14:54 Re: porting gcc to tic54x Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:33 Re: HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Dorit Nuzman
14:24 Re: HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Dorit Nuzman
14:15 RE: Help with another constraint Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:14 Re: HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Toon Moene
13:59 Re: HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Dorit Nuzman
13:34 libgfortran, libgomp not compiled with BOOT_CFLAGS. Toon Moene
13:04 Re: HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Toon Moene
12:47 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Alexandre Oliva
12:44 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
12:31 Re: HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Uros Bizjak
10:25 HIRLAM with -ftree-loop-distribution. Toon Moene
06:27 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages NightStrike
03:03 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Berlin

December 15, 2007
22:55 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Alexandre Oliva
22:51 Re: HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Sebastian Pop
21:41 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:32 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
20:25 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
10:46 How to interpret the automaton output during gcc bootstrap and -mcpu=arm926ej-s or --with-cpu=arm926ejs Martin MOKREJÅ
09:35 Re: Fails for SPEC2006 using -O3 -ftree-parallelize-loops Jakub Jelinek
04:45 Re: Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers Daniel Jacobowitz
04:17 Re: Fails for SPEC2006 using -O3 -ftree-parallelize-loops Sebastian Pop
04:12 Fails for SPEC2006 using -O3 -ftree-parallelize-loops Sebastian Pop
00:18 Re: Git and GCC Nix

December 14, 2007
22:47 gcc-4.3-20071214 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
22:35 Re: Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers Daniel Jacobowitz
22:30 Adding new dwarf encoding formats for complex integers =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
22:24 HIRLAM and -ftree-loop-linear Toon Moene
21:36 Re: Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Joel Sherrill
21:22 Re: Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Laurent GUERBY
20:45 Re: Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Joel Sherrill
20:13 Re: Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Laurent GUERBY
19:41 Re: Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Joel Sherrill
19:01 Re: Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Laurent GUERBY
18:49 Ada ACATS Failures on SVN Trunk Joel Sherrill
16:59 Re: Something is broken in repack Wolfram Gloger
16:44 Re: Something is broken in repack David Kastrup
16:19 Re: Something is broken in repack Wolfram Gloger
16:12 Re: Something is broken in repack Wolfram Gloger
16:03 Re: Something is broken in repack Wolfram Gloger
13:53 Re: how to compile gcc4 on cygwin? Tim Prince
13:25 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
10:52 Re: Something is broken in repack Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
10:40 Re: Something is broken in repack Jakub Narebski
09:39 Re: ctor style cast vs c style cast Andreas Schwab
09:02 Re: Something is broken in repack Harvey Harrison
08:42 Re: Something is broken in repack Paolo Bonzini
06:39 how to compile gcc4 on cygwin? Fan Zhang
06:24 Re: Something is broken in repack Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
06:00 help pls, about gcc-3.0.1 on HP unix 爬爬虫
02:39 Re: ctor style cast vs c style cast David Fang
02:31 ctor style cast vs c style cast Peter A. Felvegi
01:25 Re: Something is broken in repack Jakub Narebski

December 13, 2007
20:31 Re: Status of simulator targets after dataflow merge Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:06 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
17:40 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Chris Lattner
16:39 Re: Something is broken in repack Johannes Sixt
16:30 Re: Something is broken in repack Paolo Bonzini
14:41 Re: Git and GCC Rafael Espindola
14:09 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
14:09 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
13:32 Re: Something is broken in repack Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
10:22 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Nicholas Nethercote
08:10 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Paolo Bonzini
07:53 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Ollie Wild
07:39 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Ollie Wild
07:32 Re: Something is broken in repack Andreas Ericsson
07:14 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Praveen Raghavan
00:11 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Harvey Harrison
00:03 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Chris Lattner

December 12, 2007
23:41 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Harvey Harrison
23:32 Poisonous people Manuel López-Ibáñez
23:29 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Tim Josling
22:50 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Sebastian Pop
22:49 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
22:42 gcc-4.2-20071212 is now available gccadmin
22:42 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC J.C. Pizarro
21:15 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Jonathan Wakely
20:54 Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC J.C. Pizarro
20:08 [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC Diego Novillo
19:41 Re: Something is broken in repack. Why not with fork and pipes? Johannes Schindelin
18:47 Re: Something is broken in repack. Why not with fork and pipes? J.C. Pizarro
18:13 Re: branch delay slots Richard Sandiford
17:50 Re: branch delay slots Boris Boesler
17:29 Re: Help with another constraint Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:12 Re: Something is broken in repack Jon Smirl
16:54 Re: Something is broken in repack Linus Torvalds
16:42 Re: Something is broken in repack David Miller
16:37 Re: Something is broken in repack Linus Torvalds
16:19 Re: Something is broken in repack Paolo Bonzini
16:14 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
15:48 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
15:27 Re: branch delay slots Eric Botcazou
15:21 Re: branch delay slots Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: Help with another constraint 'Rask Ingemann Lambertsen'
13:01 RE: Help with another constraint Dave Korn
12:53 RE: Help with another constraint Balaji V. Iyer
12:13 RE: Help with another constraint Revital1 Eres
12:02 branch delay slots Boris Boesler
08:05 Re: Something is broken in repack David Kastrup
07:25 porting gcc to tic54x a2220333
05:13 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
05:06 RE: Help with another constraint Balaji V. Iyer

December 11, 2007
20:34 Re: Something is broken in repack Andreas Ericsson
20:26 Re: Something is broken in repack Andreas Ericsson
19:40 Re: Something is broken in repack Junio C Hamano
19:17 Re: Something is broken in repack Linus Torvalds
18:57 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
18:43 Re: Something is broken in repack Jon Smirl
17:44 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
17:28 Re: Something is broken in repack Daniel Berlin
17:24 Re: Something is broken in repack David Miller
17:21 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
17:19 error: no data type for mode ".." Bingfeng Mei
16:34 Re: Something is broken in repack Linus Torvalds
16:22 Re: Something is broken in repack Jon Smirl
16:20 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
15:36 Re: Something is broken in repack Jon Smirl
15:01 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
13:49 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
13:31 Re: Something is broken in repack Nicolas Pitre
11:11 Bootstrap Failure in trunk (fortran) Rainer Emrich
07:34 Re: Something is broken in repack Andreas Ericsson
07:01 Re: Something is broken in repack Jon Smirl
05:29 Re: Something is broken in repack Jon Smirl
03:31 Re: $prefix/lib/../$target/sys-include not in <> search path Hans-Peter Nilsson

December 10, 2007
23:28 RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Dave Korn
23:10 $prefix/lib/../$target/sys-include not in <> search path Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:56 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:48 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Andreas Schwab
22:44 gcc-4.1-20071210 is now available gccadmin
22:35 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Andreas Schwab
22:22 Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version) Mark Mitchell
21:05 Re: Using -mlittle-endian or -mbig-endian options.... Michael Meissner
21:05 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Ian Lance Taylor
20:59 Clarification on section variable attribute usage [try #2] Franck Bui-Huu
20:35 PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version) Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:24 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Jan Hudec
20:06 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Joe Buck
20:01 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Brian Dessent
19:37 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Andreas Schwab
19:22 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:19 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Joe Buck
18:32 RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Dave Korn
17:31 Re: [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export Daniel Berlin
17:16 Re: Help with another constraint 'Rask Ingemann Lambertsen'
17:02 Re: [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export Alexander Monakov
16:55 Re: VLIW scheduling and delayed branch Thomas Sailer
16:11 Alias-analysis in gccint Yao Qi
16:09 Re: [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export Alexander Monakov
15:36 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
13:59 libiberty: make install doesn't install obstack.h (mingw32) Phil Lello
13:07 Re: Using -mlittle-endian or -mbig-endian options.... Tim Prince
11:39 Re: Inserting arbitrary GIMPLE statements & alias analysis Gabriele SVELTO
10:45 Re: Inserting arbitrary GIMPLE statements & alias analysis Richard Guenther
10:18 Re: VLIW scheduling and delayed branch Hariharan Sandanagobalane
10:15 Re: VLIW scheduling and delayed branch Pranav Bhandarkar
09:57 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
09:57 Using -mlittle-endian or -mbig-endian options.... ashish mahamuni
09:54 Re: Git and GCC Gabriel Paubert
09:53 Inserting arbitrary GIMPLE statements & alias analysis Gabriele SVELTO
08:44 Re: Regarding David Daney
07:25 Regarding ashish mahamuni
01:48 Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version Gabriel Dos Reis
00:37 Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version Mark Mitchell

December 09, 2007
23:21 Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version Richard Guenther
22:06 Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version Kaveh R. GHAZI
16:35 RE: Help with another constraint Balaji V. Iyer
14:28 Fwd: Cross compiler build stops S . Reng
13:07 Re: Help with another constraint Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
08:55 Help with another constraint Balaji V. Iyer
07:02 Re: [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export Revital1 Eres
01:51 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin

December 08, 2007
23:21 Re: gnat1 huge time Ludovic Brenta
20:49 Re: VLIW scheduling and delayed branch Thomas Sailer
20:28 Re: Git and GCC Marco Costalba
19:54 Re: Git and GCC Joe Buck
19:45 Re: The Regents of the University of California BSD-license in GPLed GCC. Joe Buck
18:33 Re: The Regents of the University of California BSD-license in GPLed GCC. Toon Moene
15:06 VLIW scheduling and delayed branch Hariharan Sandanagobalane
12:24 Re: Git and GCC Johannes Schindelin
12:01 Re: Git and GCC Johannes Schindelin
11:31 The Regents of the University of California BSD-license in GPLed GCC. J.C. Pizarro
06:12 Where was gone? Nikky
04:39 Re: Howto make another convertion with _identifiers_ following '#' in libcpp Zack Weinberg
03:51 Howto make another convertion with _identifiers_ following '#' in libcpp Lijuan Hai
02:21 Re: Git and GCC J.C. Pizarro
01:55 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
01:49 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8 Joseph S. Myers
00:47 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison

December 07, 2007
23:33 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
23:14 Re: Git and GCC Giovanni Bajo
23:04 Re: Git and GCC Luke Lu
22:53 gcc-4.3-20071207 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8 (was: Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing) Ian Lance Taylor
22:14 Re: Git and GCC Jakub Narebski
20:55 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:52 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Andreas Schwab
20:49 Re: [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export Daniel Berlin
20:37 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8 Ross Ridge
20:27 Re: Git and GCC Giovanni Bajo
19:38 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Ross Ridge
19:36 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
19:04 BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8 (was: Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing) Boris Boesler
18:47 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? J.C. Pizarro
18:40 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Ian Lance Taylor
18:31 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Diego Novillo
18:28 RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Dave Korn
18:14 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Andrew Haley
18:09 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? J.C. Pizarro
17:59 Re: ETAPS Conferences Sebastian Pop
17:50 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Joe Buck
17:42 RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Dave Korn
17:24 RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? J.C. Pizarro
17:24 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
17:09 RE: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Dave Korn
16:59 Re: libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Ian Lance Taylor
16:19 Broken link for Modula-3 front end. Smith-Rowland, Edward M
16:10 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Marco Costalba
15:08 libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse? Dave Korn
15:01 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
15:01 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
14:42 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? J.C. Pizarro
14:28 ETAPS Conferences Emmanuel Fleury
14:04 [RFC/RFT] Improving SMS by data dependence export Alexander Monakov
13:56 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Jakub Narebski
12:53 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
12:44 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Andreas Ericsson
12:14 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Jakub Narebski
07:57 Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? Marcel Holtmann
07:31 Re: Git and GCC Jeff King
07:27 Re: Git and GCC Jeff King
07:11 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
07:08 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
06:50 Re: Git and GCC Jeff King
06:39 Re: Git and GCC Jeff King
05:40 Re: Help with the Machine Description Revital1 Eres
05:37 Re: Git and GCC NightStrike
05:22 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
04:21 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
03:31 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
02:42 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
02:10 In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did? J.C. Pizarro
00:30 Re: Git and GCC Jakub Narebski

December 06, 2007
22:52 Help with the Machine Description Balaji V. Iyer
22:44 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
22:38 [OT] Re: Git and GCC Randy Dunlap
22:30 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
22:25 Re: Git and GCC David Kastrup
22:22 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
22:11 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
22:08 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
21:39 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
21:02 Re: Git and GCC Junio C Hamano
20:43 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
20:37 Re: Git and GCC. Why not with fork, exec and pipes like in linux? J.C. Pizarro
20:35 Re: Git and GCC Andrey Belevantsev
20:04 Re: Git and GCC Junio C Hamano
19:40 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
19:31 Re: Git and GCC Ismail DÃnmez
19:29 Re: Git and GCC Vincent Lefevre
19:25 Re: Git and GCC. Why not with fork, exec and pipes like in linux? J.C. Pizarro
19:13 Re: Git and GCC Jon Loeliger
19:08 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
19:07 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive J.C. Pizarro
18:56 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
18:46 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
18:36 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
18:29 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
18:24 Re: Git and GCC NightStrike
18:15 Re: Git and GCC Ian Lance Taylor
18:05 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
18:03 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
17:39 Re: Git and GCC Jeff King
17:08 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive David Kastrup
16:19 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Linus Torvalds
15:56 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Johannes Schindelin
15:56 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Johannes Schindelin
15:31 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Harvey Harrison
14:23 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Pierre Habouzit
14:18 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
14:15 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Nicolas Pitre
14:02 Re: Git and GCC Nicolas Pitre
13:43 Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Theodore Tso
13:41 Re: update_stmt calls Andrew MacLeod
12:23 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
12:04 [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Johannes Schindelin
12:04 Re: Git and GCC Ismail DÃnmez
11:57 Re: Git and GCC Johannes Schindelin
11:01 How to define a blackbox data type in gcc? Bingfeng Mei
10:45 Re: Patch manager dying for a week or two Tobias Burnus
09:53 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Andreas Schwab
09:52 Re: Git and GCC Andreas Schwab
09:40 Generate Codes for a something like stack/dataflow computer Li Wang
09:28 : RE : CONSIGNMENT DELIVERY TO YOUR DOOR-STEP OVERSEAS CREDIT COMMISION
08:12 Re: Git and GCC David Brown
07:49 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
07:15 Re: Git and GCC Jeff King
06:48 Re: Git and GCC Jon Smirl
06:09 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
05:17 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
05:15 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
05:11 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
05:04 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
04:54 Re: Git and GCC Linus Torvalds
04:48 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
04:33 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
04:28 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
04:25 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
04:20 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
04:04 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Jonathan Adamczewski
03:47 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
02:52 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
02:41 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
02:28 Re: Git and GCC David Miller
02:07 Re: libbid and floatingpoint exception access funcs H.J. Lu
00:42 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Dewar
00:29 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Ben Elliston
00:17 Re: iWMMXt/Linux EABI toolchain Paul Brook
00:01 Re: Git and GCC Ollie Wild

December 05, 2007
23:37 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
23:35 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
23:34 Re: Git and GCC Andreas Schwab
23:16 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Ben Elliston
22:51 Re: Git and GCC J.C. Pizarro
22:44 gcc-4.2-20071205 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: Patch manager dying for a week or two Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
22:37 RE: Patch manager dying for a week or two Dave Korn
22:11 Re: iWMMXt/Linux EABI toolchain Daniel Jacobowitz
22:10 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Joe Buck
21:56 Re: Git and GCC NightStrike
21:55 Broken regression testing on Intel Darwin9 Dominique Dhumieres
21:50 Re: Git and GCC Harvey Harrison
21:48 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
21:40 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
21:32 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Ian Lance Taylor
21:32 Re: Patch manager dying for a week or two NightStrike
21:25 Re: ACATS c460008 and VRP (was: Bootstrap failure on trunk: x86_64-linux-gnu) Richard Kenner
21:25 Common logging config Richard Almquist
21:20 Re: ACATS c460008 and VRP (was: Bootstrap failure on trunk: x86_64-linux-gnu) Richard Kenner
21:04 Patch manager dying for a week or two Daniel Berlin
20:23 Re: Git and GCC Samuel Tardieu
20:08 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Boris Boesler
19:36 Re: Git and GCC Ollie Wild
19:36 Re: Git and GCC Ismail DÃnmez
19:16 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
19:13 Re: Git and GCC NightStrike
19:11 Re: Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
19:08 Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
14:21 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Diego Novillo
14:02 libbid and floatingpoint exception access funcs Bernhard Fischer
10:48 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Andrew Pinski
09:31 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Jan Beulich
01:21 Re: Bad offset to struct member in generated code Ian Lance Taylor
00:55 Bad offset to struct member in generated code Paul Zimmerman

December 04, 2007
22:10 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Jeffrey Law
20:44 Clarification on section variable attribute usage Franck Bui-Huu
19:02 Serious Bugs In Gcc Builds Thomas Dineen
16:45 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Tom Tromey
15:36 fw[1]: Ванда
14:46 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:05 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
11:50 FW[0]: Лидия
10:19 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Kiesling
04:03 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Nicholas Nethercote
01:56 problems when move one pseudo reg to another (need help) r z
01:21 Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h' Thomas Schwinge
01:05 Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h' Ian Lance Taylor

December 03, 2007
23:47 Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h' Thomas Schwinge
23:19 Re: Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h' Ian Lance Taylor
22:49 Issue with fixincludes (?) and `limits.h' Thomas Schwinge
22:41 gcc-4.1-20071203 is now available gccadmin
20:44 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Tim Josling
18:58 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Diego Novillo
18:51 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
18:49 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
18:20 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Diego Novillo
18:13 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:58 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Ian Lance Taylor
17:54 Re: How to reinterpret data in GIMPLE. Andrew Pinski
17:48 How to reinterpret data in GIMPLE. Sjodin, Jan
17:47 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Bernd Schmidt
17:37 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
17:35 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Richard Kenner
17:33 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Diego Novillo
17:28 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Robert Dewar
17:26 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Dewar
16:50 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Kiesling
16:38 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
16:34 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Andi Kleen
16:20 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
16:05 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Richard Kenner
15:55 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
15:48 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
15:02 Re: gnat1 huge time Joel Sherrill
14:41 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
14:15 Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking] Olivier Galibert
14:10 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Robert Dewar
14:07 [RFC] Introduce middle-end expressions on arrays Richard Guenther
13:29 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
13:24 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Richard Kenner
13:16 Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking] george at georgeshagov dot com
12:20 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Andi Kleen
09:28 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Andreas Schwab
06:45 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Nicholas Nethercote
06:16 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
06:02 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
04:51 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
04:06 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
04:03 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
03:55 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
02:41 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Kiesling
00:30 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages DJ Delorie
00:21 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
00:16 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Robert Dewar

December 02, 2007
23:54 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Jacobowitz
23:32 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Dewar
23:31 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Joseph S. Myers
23:29 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Dewar
23:28 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Dewar
23:05 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Ben Elliston
23:03 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Ben Elliston
22:55 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
21:11 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
21:01 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
20:59 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages tim
20:52 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages tim
20:40 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
20:36 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
20:28 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
20:23 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Daniel Berlin
18:33 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Andi Kleen
14:27 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Robert Kiesling
13:05 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
12:43 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Bernd Schmidt
12:28 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Richard Kenner
12:25 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
12:04 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:48 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Samuel Tardieu
11:43 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Samuel Tardieu
11:32 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
11:14 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Samuel Tardieu
10:52 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Samuel Tardieu
10:50 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
10:43 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Samuel Tardieu
10:27 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Eric Botcazou
10:23 Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Andreas Schwab
10:05 Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages Samuel Tardieu
09:41 [RFC] Cleaning up latch blocks Revital1 Eres
08:59 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Samuel Tardieu
02:34 ADOPT A PUP OR KITTEN THIS XMAS. PET BREEDERS WORLD

December 01, 2007
23:32 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Robert Dewar
22:35 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:37 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Andreas Schwab
12:04 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Eric Botcazou
12:03 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:53 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:21 Re: problems compiling a program with -m32 Richard Guenther
09:55 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
09:48 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
05:54 problems compiling a program with -m32 darvish
03:32 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Mark Mitchell
01:32 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Joseph S. Myers
00:56 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Michael Eager

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3