This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion

From: tbp <tbptbp at gmail dot com>
To: "Weddington, Eric" <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>
Cc: "Michael Meissner" <michael dot meissner at amd dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, christophe dot harle at amd dot com
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:01:32 +0100
Subject: Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion
References: <20071128205737.GA28277@mmeissner-gold.amd.com> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D520E267@csomb01.corp.atmel.com>

On Nov 29, 2007 9:29 PM, Weddington, Eric <eweddington@cso.atmel.com> wrote:
> and I would also postulate the general embedded community, would
> *really* like to have this functionality, especially your Stage 1. There
> are many AVR, or embedded, applications where they are generally
> optimized for size, but have a time-critical function that needs to be
> optimized for speed.
I would personally, and i think it hasn't been evoked  yet, *really*
like to be able to toggle fast-math (or related flags) per function,
basically for the same reason.

References:
- Function specific optimizations call for discussion
  - From: Michael Meissner
- RE: Function specific optimizations call for discussion
  - From: Weddington, Eric

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]