This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'Stephane Hockenhull'" <shockenhull at niceberg dot com>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'Andreas Schwab'" <schwab at suse dot de>, "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" <drow at false dot org>, "'Joe Buck'" <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:49:12 -0000
Subject: RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
References: <200711261333.54555.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <200711281233.12136.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <00ca01c831e5$084153f0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200711281356.58343.shockenhull@niceberg.com>

On 28 November 2007 18:57, Stephane Hockenhull wrote:

> if you actually read my email 

  Of course I read your email.

> I said :
>>> the std::string template is ----> ****NOT**** <---- compiled into the .s
>>> file 

  Well, yes, but you also said they weren't anywhere else either.

  So it wasn't entirely unreasonable of me to assume that one of those two
statements was incorrect and they both needed verifying.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

References:
- why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]