This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates

From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' <drow at false dot org>
To: Stephane Hockenhull <shockenhull at niceberg dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, 'Andreas Schwab' <schwab at suse dot de>, 'Joe Buck' <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:01:29 -0500
Subject: Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
References: <200711261333.54555.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <200711281233.12136.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <00ca01c831e5$084153f0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200711281356.58343.shockenhull@niceberg.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:56:58PM -0500, Stephane Hockenhull wrote:
> hence my question: where is it?

In libstdc++.  You have to link with libstdc++ to use the STL, for
many reasons including this one.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull

References:
- why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]