This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Stephane Hockenhull" <shockenhull at niceberg dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at false dot org>, "Joe Buck" <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:40:00 -0800
Subject: Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
References: <200711261333.54555.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <20071127184726.GA20032@caradoc.them.org> <001001c83127$bb18a820$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200711271539.45293.shockenhull@niceberg.com>

On 11/27/07, Stephane Hockenhull <shockenhull@niceberg.com> wrote:
> no, it would not.
> because for one simple fact: COFF format lacks many features of ELF.

What features are missing?  COFF is not used for Windows 32 anyways,
it is PE-COFF.  I am just wondering what exactly is missing that you
think you need to go this route.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull

References:
- why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
- RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]