This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates

From: Stephane Hockenhull <shockenhull at niceberg dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:54:29 -0500
Subject: Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
References: <200711261333.54555.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <20071127002935.GI17815@synopsys.com> <20071127034801.GA20246@caradoc.them.org>

On Monday 26 November 2007 22:48, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> It's the default for a lot of targets. ?I'd still like to see a
> concrete example of the problem...

we're cross-compiling to win32, everything works fine until we use the 
std::string template, 
the special case name mangling for std::string is partially broken by 
-fleading-underscore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34166

-- 
Stephane Hockenhull
SSC-Studios.com

References:
- why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]